#Manta The listing last night caused some controversy, but the price is still very stable, which means that for users, "It's not that OP and ARB can't afford it, but the 2 billion L2 is more cost-effective." As a small investor who has been with the project for 3 years, I think This time the price of #Manta has been maintained very well.

The biggest controversy yesterday was the Celer card currency. They were entangled with compliance policies and legal security. It is said that the two sides have been at odds for a long time. Today, it seems that liquidity has been restored. If it can fall back to the prefix 1 in the next few days, it may be a good opportunity.

After looking at the currently circulating $MANTA Tokens, most of them are public offerings, airdrops and Binance Launchpad. Most of the chips are in the hands of retail investors. It will take a while for the hands to change hands to wash the dishes. There is still a good chance of washing the dishes.

I always feel that there are too many #Layer2, and they are all linked with one click, and there is a feeling of overcapacity. Users will not really study the technology carefully when choosing a chain. The key to winning in the future will still be who can produce excellent applications. However, the current application homogeneity is very serious, and the volumes have begun to be subdivided again.

From an ecological perspective, I scanned the MantaNetwork official tweet and saw that there is already a project based on Manta Pacific, WebmiPro, and Webmi will airdrop 6,000,000 $WEBMI to all $MANTA holders. The efficiency is unimaginably high.

Webmi builds a game ID protocol through smart contracts to provide on-chain certificates for users' Web3 operations. As we all know, $MANTA has a huge retail investor base, which is also a good opportunity for Webmi to be exposed to the market.