$EGLD #MultiversX #Elrond #FAIL #RIP
$EGLD #EGLDBTC #EGLD/USDT #EGLD
Why MultiversX (EGLD) Faces Significant Challenges: 17 Key Issues
MultiversX, formerly known as Elrond, initially generated excitement with its ambitious promises of high performance and scalability. However, the project has faced numerous obstacles that have led many to question its long-term viability. Here’s a look at seventeen reasons why MultiversX is often considered a struggling crypto project, supported by real-world examples and data.

1. Overpromising and Underdelivering:
MultiversX claimed it could handle thousands of transactions per second with minimal fees. In practice, it often fell short of these claims. During peak times, performance issues and transaction speeds didn’t meet expectations, leading to user dissatisfaction.

2. Lack of Adoption:
Adoption is crucial for any blockchain project’s success. MultiversX has struggled to build a significant user base and attract developer interest. Compared to platforms like Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain, which have extensive dApp ecosystems, MultiversX has not achieved similar traction.

3. High Transaction Fees and Network Congestion:
Although MultiversX initially promoted low transaction fees, users have reported increasing costs and network congestion as the network grew. In 2023, transaction fees spiked during periods of high activity, contradicting the project's promises and causing frustration.

4. Competitive Market:
The blockchain space is highly competitive, with established players like Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain, as well as newcomers like Solana and Polkadot. MultiversX has struggled to stand out and offer unique advantages, making it difficult to gain a significant market share.

5. Technical Issues and Bugs:
Technical reliability is essential, yet MultiversX has faced several issues, including bugs and network downtimes. In early 2024, a major bug caused a temporary halt in transactions, undermining user confidence and exposing vulnerabilities.

6. Limited Developer Ecosystem:
A thriving developer community is crucial for blockchain success. MultiversX has had difficulty building such a community. By mid-2024, the number of dApps on MultiversX was significantly lower than on more established platforms, indicating a lack of developer engagement.

7. Regulatory Challenges:
Regulatory hurdles can impede a project’s progress. MultiversX has faced compliance issues, particularly in key markets. In 2023, these challenges led to operational delays and legal complications, impacting the project's reputation.

8. Inconsistent Project Updates:
Regular and transparent updates are vital for maintaining trust. MultiversX has been criticized for inconsistent communication and a lack of clarity about development plans, leading to confusion and diminished confidence among investors and users.

9. Market Sentiment and Investor Confidence:
Investor sentiment is crucial. MultiversX has seen fluctuating levels of confidence. For example, during a major market downturn in late 2023, EGLD’s value dropped sharply, reflecting broader concerns about the project's future.

10. Security Issues and Hacks:
Security is a major concern, and MultiversX has suffered from significant hacks. In late 2022, a security vulnerability was exploited, resulting in financial losses. Another attack in early 2024 targeted smart contracts, further exposing ongoing security weaknesses.

11. Failing Rebranding Efforts:
The rebranding from Elrond to MultiversX was intended to rejuvenate the project's image but proved largely ineffective. Instead of addressing core issues, the rebranding was seen as a superficial change, failing to resolve underlying problems.

12. Blaming the Community:
MultiversX’s leadership has frequently blamed the community for the project’s failures. Rather than taking responsibility, the team has shifted blame onto users and investors, creating a negative atmosphere and eroding trust.

13. Team Mismanagement and Financial Concerns:
The project’s team has faced accusations of mismanagement and unethical behavior. Critics argue that the team prioritized extracting profits through their commercial ventures while neglecting critical project issues, leading to accusations of deceiving and mocking investors.

14. Promotion of Toxicity on Social Media:
MultiversX has been criticized for fostering a toxic environment on social media. Official channels have been known for hostile interactions and a lack of accountability, which has further alienated users and investors and compounded the project's issues.

15. Censorship and Bans for Asking Questions:
MultiversX has faced criticism for censoring discussions and banning users from its official Telegram channels. Asking questions about the project or expressing concerns can lead to permanent bans, creating an environment of censorship and discouraging open dialogue. This approach has been seen as an attempt to stifle dissent and control the narrative, further damaging the project’s reputation.

16. Failed Wallet Coin Launches:
MultiversX has experienced multiple failed launches of its wallet coin, MEX. The initial launch saw a drastic drop in value, with investors facing up to a 99% loss on their holdings. The second launch, which took place in early 2023, was particularly problematic. Investors reported that the launch was accompanied by misleading information and technical issues that led to significant financial losses. Many users felt scammed, as the promised features and improvements did not materialize. A third MEX launch recently occurred, but early indicators suggest it may also be failing, as early trading volumes and price performance have been disappointing, compounding the project's credibility issues.

17. Lack of Valuable Projects and Utility:
MultiversX has been criticized for its lack of valuable, utility-based projects. Many of the projects built on its platform have been described as failed meme ventures rather than serious, utility-driven applications. The absence of substantial, innovative projects has diminished the platform's attractiveness and utility, further impacting its reputation and user engagement.

Forbes Commentary:
Forbes’ "Crypto Zombies" article critically examined EGLD, noting that the project had not lived up to its initial promises. The article emphasized that despite MultiversX's bold claims regarding its technological capabilities and market potential, it struggled with performance issues and failed to achieve significant adoption. Forbes highlighted these challenges as contributing factors to the project’s ongoing difficulties in the competitive crypto landscape.

Conclusion? Facts talk...
MultiversX’s journey underscores the difficulties of achieving success in the blockchain space. Despite its ambitious start, the project has faced significant issues related to adoption, technical performance, security, rebranding, leadership, community management, censorship, failed financial initiatives, and the lack of substantial projects. While there may still be potential for recovery, these seventeen issues illustrate why MultiversX is often seen as a struggling initiative in the crypto world.

Stay safe and away from this meme Blockchain.

Many mini game airdrops on Telegram are like fireworks that explode quickly, make a splash for a moment, but are quickly extinguished. There are several reasons why many of them fall before they really shine.
Firstly, imagine being invited to a party, being promised delicious food, but when you arrive, you're only given bland snacks. That's how most of these minigames feel. They're often intriguing at first, but once you play them, they're not much more than that, nothing addictive. Eventually, people get lazy and don't come back for more.
Second, hype. Who doesn't like sweet promises? Many of these airdrops come with big promises, like a dream sold too cheaply. But after the plunge, the reality is far from the expectations. It's like buying a cat in a sack - once the sack is opened, you get a mouse instead.
Third, competition. The gaming world is like a night market full of attractions, and if you only bring mediocre tricks, who will stop watching? With all the big, exciting games out there, Telegram's mini-games are often outshined, like the grocery store next to the big mall.
And then there's the community. A game without a strong community is like a shop without regular customers. Once or twice someone might stop by, but if no one stays, the business will slowly go under. People come for an airdrop, but after that? They disappear without a trace.
And let's not forget about technology. Sometimes, playing games on Telegram can make your head spin because of technical issues, like a car breaking down in the middle of the road when you're having fun. If the network you're using is expensive or slow, you might not want to continue playing. Who wants to waste time when there's a smooth highway out there?
Last but not least, marketing. Many of these projects come without a plan. It's like a traveling salesman without shouting to offer his wares. If you just rely on the airdrop wind, people come for a while to grab the bonus, then leave again. There is no long-term strategy to attract people back again.
So, it all comes down to one thing: minigame airdrops on Telegram often fail because they don't provide a meaningful experience and don't have any lasting appeal. Like fireworks that disappear before they can be enjoyed.
-===-
#miniapp #fail #airdrop #telegram