In the future AI track of $NEAR , some people say apt, some say near, some say io. If you don't understand, let me teach you the simplest way to choose.
First, look at the market capitalization. The digital market has developed to a certain extent, gradually maturing compared to the previous chaos.
So, would a coin that has maintained a high market capitalization for a long time be the leader in the corresponding sector? You will find an amazing thing: many small coins may not have even doubled in this market, but most of the coins with high market capitalization have already doubled. You might think that the higher the market capitalization, the harder it is to rise, but that's not really the case;
Second, look at circulation. Without studying linear unlocking, just focus on high circulation. The higher the circulation, the less pressure there is from unlocking, which can reduce long-term holding risks. Moreover, most people don't even use tools to study unlocking cycles;
Third, look at the community. The larger and more active the community, the higher the participation and consensus. Some small coins that not many people pay attention to really have no participation significance. You may unknowingly get cut by the market, with serious control, which is not much different from a Ponzi scheme; Fourth, look at the vision. The vision should have feasibility, progress, and reports. If it's just like Old Jia's ppt for car manufacturing, when can we expect results?
Fifth, look at the team. Personal experience suggests staying away from any domestic schemes. I personally feel that CZ and Old Xu are truly a breath of fresh air in the coin circle. What a mess domestic schemes are, using some random foreign names, putting on a shell to launch projects. They are not lacking in technology; they are just used to making quick money, lacking responsibility and accountability, and lacking trust and support.
Of course, there is other information to pay attention to; stay tuned for my updates, continuous analysis
