Contracts can only be kept in good condition if they are anchored to a reliable standard, because contracts are too easy to go wrong, and once they go wrong, it will be a big loss.
There is not much skill in making a very dull standard. The purpose is to avoid going wrong.
It is easy to make money in a short time, but it is too difficult to keep it from going wrong for a long time. Giving up any skills and sticking to a dull standard is to extend the time of not going wrong as much as possible.
The way to expand profits is not to strengthen skills, but to gradually expand the risk amount while maintaining the consistency of standards.
Reliable standards can be right every time. Only standards that can be right every time are reliable standards, even if they are dull.
For the idea of relying on experience and feeling to make contracts, I think it is a dead end.
Anchoring a dull standard is the only way out.
