PEOPLEtoken
58,688 views
68 Posts
Hot
Latest
$PEOPLE Guys, #PEOPLEtoken has a good time, Just buy as much as you can and hold it until February 28, just see the results, it has potentials UpTo 8X.
LIVEQami-05
--
Bullish
$PEOPLE âïžâïžđđ
To monn đđđ
#ETH #BTC #PEOPLEtoken
To monn đđđ
#ETH #BTC #PEOPLEtoken
$PEOPLE #PEOPLEtoken is at an abnormal high. ConstitutionDAO, the organization behind the coin, has been dissolved. The high price at the market is manipulation for whales to short the Longs big-time
what do you think about #PEOPLEtoken & #PepeCoinRise ? and please give me a suggestion about investment , which coin is Best for now to invest ? đ«âșïžđ„°đ
#Write2Earn #BTC #TrendingTopic
#Write2Earn #BTC #TrendingTopic
Digital art is a form of creative expression that uses digital technologies to produce or display artworks. Digital art can include images, animations, videos, audio, games, and interactive installations. One of the recent trends in digital art is the use of non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which are unique and verifiable digital certificates of ownership that can be attached to any digital file. NFTs allow artists to sell their digital artworks directly to collectors, without intermediaries or physical copies, and to benefit from secondary sales and royalties.
One of the challenges of digital art is to establish its value and authenticity in a world where digital files can be easily copied and distributed. NFTs address this issue by using blockchain technology, which is a decentralized and secure system of storing and verifying data, to create a permanent and immutable record of the creation and ownership of each digital artwork. NFTs also enable new forms of artistic expression, such as generative art, which is art that is created by algorithms or rules, and programmable art, which is art that can change over time or according to external inputs.
The popularity and demand for NFT-based digital art have soared in the past year, reaching unprecedented levels of sales and media attention. Some of the notable examples of NFT-based digital art include:
- Beeple's "Everydays: The First 5000 Days", a collage of 5000 daily images that the artist created over 13 years, which sold for $69 million at Christie's auction in March 2021Âč.
- CryptoPunks, a collection of 10,000 pixelated characters that were generated by an algorithm in 2017, which have become one of the most sought-after and expensive NFTs, with some individual CryptoPunks selling for millions of dollarsÂČ.
- Constitution DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization that raised over $40 million in ETH from 17,000 donors in a few days, with the goal of buying a copy of the U.S. Constitution at a Sotheby's auction in November 2021.#PEOPLEtoken $PEOPLE
One of the challenges of digital art is to establish its value and authenticity in a world where digital files can be easily copied and distributed. NFTs address this issue by using blockchain technology, which is a decentralized and secure system of storing and verifying data, to create a permanent and immutable record of the creation and ownership of each digital artwork. NFTs also enable new forms of artistic expression, such as generative art, which is art that is created by algorithms or rules, and programmable art, which is art that can change over time or according to external inputs.
The popularity and demand for NFT-based digital art have soared in the past year, reaching unprecedented levels of sales and media attention. Some of the notable examples of NFT-based digital art include:
- Beeple's "Everydays: The First 5000 Days", a collage of 5000 daily images that the artist created over 13 years, which sold for $69 million at Christie's auction in March 2021Âč.
- CryptoPunks, a collection of 10,000 pixelated characters that were generated by an algorithm in 2017, which have become one of the most sought-after and expensive NFTs, with some individual CryptoPunks selling for millions of dollarsÂČ.
- Constitution DAO, a decentralized autonomous organization that raised over $40 million in ETH from 17,000 donors in a few days, with the goal of buying a copy of the U.S. Constitution at a Sotheby's auction in November 2021.#PEOPLEtoken $PEOPLE
#PEOPLEtoken
it's current price is #$0.045 and is about to hit 0.080, a very good chance to make profit with $PEOPLE
it's current price is #$0.045 and is about to hit 0.080, a very good chance to make profit with $PEOPLE
people token and bonk coin are getting listed on trubit.com #BONKđ” #PEOPLEtoken
Name - Constitution DAO (People)
Coin Rank - #266
Market Cap $239,759,982
24 Hour Trading Vol $465,360,995
Circulating Supply 5,066,640,813
Total Supply 5,066,640,813
Max Supply 5,066,640,813
Constitution DAO was an experiment that has now been dissolved. In November 2021, a group web3-enthusiasts gathered as a decentralized autonomous organization with the shared objective of buying a copy of the U.S. Constitution at a Sothebyâs Auction. There are only 13 original physical copies of the U.S Constitution in existence, which meant that this auction sparked a competitive bidding battle. Even though the group managed to raise well over $40 million in ETH, it ultimately fell short and was outbid by Ken Griffin, a billionaire hedge fund manager and CEO of Citadel.
$PEOPLE
#TrendingTopic #Write2Earn⏠#PEOPLEtoken #BullRally #gemcoin
Coin Rank - #266
Market Cap $239,759,982
24 Hour Trading Vol $465,360,995
Circulating Supply 5,066,640,813
Total Supply 5,066,640,813
Max Supply 5,066,640,813
Constitution DAO was an experiment that has now been dissolved. In November 2021, a group web3-enthusiasts gathered as a decentralized autonomous organization with the shared objective of buying a copy of the U.S. Constitution at a Sothebyâs Auction. There are only 13 original physical copies of the U.S Constitution in existence, which meant that this auction sparked a competitive bidding battle. Even though the group managed to raise well over $40 million in ETH, it ultimately fell short and was outbid by Ken Griffin, a billionaire hedge fund manager and CEO of Citadel.
$PEOPLE
#TrendingTopic #Write2Earn⏠#PEOPLEtoken #BullRally #gemcoin
đȘPEOPLE/USDT
(Short)
Cross (50X)
Entry Targets:
0.02908
đŻ TP:
1)0.028789
2)0.028498
3)0.028208
4)0.027917
5)0.027626
6)0.027335
7) To the moon đ
âïžSL:
0.031988
#Write2Earn
#BTCâŹ
#PEOPLEtoken
(Short)
Cross (50X)
Entry Targets:
0.02908
đŻ TP:
1)0.028789
2)0.028498
3)0.028208
4)0.027917
5)0.027626
6)0.027335
7) To the moon đ
âïžSL:
0.031988
#Write2Earn
#BTCâŹ
#PEOPLEtoken
You guy's are not Appreciating me I'm really sad and I think I should need to stop giving profitable Signals đąđąđą
MY Signal Update đ
#PEOPLEtoken going to hit the BOOM BOOM Tp
MY Signal Update đ
#PEOPLEtoken going to hit the BOOM BOOM Tp
LIVE
MUHAMMAD_ARSLAN280
--
Bullish
#PEOPLEUSDT
LONG đâ â
ENTRY TARGET'S ( 0.03850 )
LEVERAGE 10x Cross
TAKE Profit Target's đđđŻ
1) 0.03900
2) 0.03930
3) 0.03950
4) 0.04000
5) 0.04050
6) 0.04100
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„
SL 0.3390
LONG đâ â
ENTRY TARGET'S ( 0.03850 )
LEVERAGE 10x Cross
TAKE Profit Target's đđđŻ
1) 0.03900
2) 0.03930
3) 0.03950
4) 0.04000
5) 0.04050
6) 0.04100
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„đ„
SL 0.3390
$21 billion less ETH in circulation since POS, deflation dropped to 1.4%
Under the proof-of-work method, more than 5.5 million additional ETH will be in circulation, causing the inflation rate to drop to -0.23%.
According to data from ultrasound.money, the supply of the Ethereum network has decreased by 417,413 ETH since the transition to the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism in September 2022. In the 540 days since the merger, 1,509,991 ETH has been destroyed, while only 1,092,578 ETH have been newly issued to the network, resulting in a net supply reduction.
As of now, the market cap of ETH withdrawn from supply is $1.653 billion, with an annual inflation rate of -0.23%.
Meanwhile, Bitcoinâs supply increased by 1.716% over the same period. This highlights the different monetary policies of the two largest cryptocurrencies, as Bitcoin maintains predictable issuance rules. Therefore, Ethereum's supply changes now depend on the balance between staking rewards and transaction fee burning.
According to Ultrasound.moneyâs proof-of-work (PoW) simulation, if the Ethereum network had not switched to PoS, the supply of Ethereum would have increased by more than 5.5 million ETH during the same period. Under the PoW model, the simulation shows that at the same 1.5 million ETH burn rate, 7,031,556 ETH would be issued, resulting in a post-merger net increase of 5,521,564 ETH. According to the simulation, the value of these ETHs would be $21.865 billion, representing a theoretical inflation rate of 3.26%
This stark difference highlights the deflationary impact of Ethereumâs new consensus design compared to previous mining-based systems. The shift from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) significantly reduces the amount of new ETH issuance, as the network is now secured through validators staking ETH, rather than PoW miners. This shift, coupled with the continuous burning mechanism introduced by EIP-1559, has put downward pressure on Ethereumâs supply growth.
According to real-time data, the current total circulating supply of Ethereum is 120,103,624 ETH. At the same time, according to PoW simulations, the supply would reach 125,625,188 ETH if miners were still operating in the old model.
The reduction in supply since the merger is in line with the Ethereum communityâs vision of making ETH an asset that deflates over time, as opposed to Bitcoinâs fixed inflation rules. Advocates believe that the combination of staking rewards and fee burning will continue to offset new issuance, potentially causing ETH to enter a period of net negative growth.
An increase in Ethereum network fees has contributed to a rise in deflationary behavior over the past seven days, reaching -1.435%. Furthermore, even under PoW, its inflation rate will drop to 1.911% due to the surge in network activity and its correlation with the burning mechanism.
However, critics argue that the move to PoS centralizes control of the network into the hands of major staking entities and exchanges. Some have warned that the concentration of staked ETH could undermine Ethereumâs decentralization and security guarantees compared to Bitcoinâs more decentralized mining network.
As Ethereum continues to evolve under the new PoS regime, while Bitcoin maintains its established PoW model, observers will be watching closely to see how their respective supply dynamics and security tradeoffs unfold. Due to the upcoming Bitcoin halving, its issuance will be cut in half, bringing its inflation rate down to 0.8%, less than 1% different from Ethereum. However, the circulating supply of Bitcoin is fixed and will eventually reach zero inflation. Ethereumâs inflation rate is related to network activity and the amount burned through network transactions.
Still, ETHâs deflationary trend over the past 540 days, ahead of Bitcoinâs first halving since the merger, gives us a first look at the potential future of the two largest cryptocurrencies.
The long-term sustainability and impact of both networks remains to be seen, with Bitcoin currently having a market capitalization of $1.3 trillion and Ethereum not far behind with a market capitalization of $478 billion.
#TrendingTopic #EOS #Aevo #BTTC. #PEOPLEtoken
According to data from ultrasound.money, the supply of the Ethereum network has decreased by 417,413 ETH since the transition to the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism in September 2022. In the 540 days since the merger, 1,509,991 ETH has been destroyed, while only 1,092,578 ETH have been newly issued to the network, resulting in a net supply reduction.
As of now, the market cap of ETH withdrawn from supply is $1.653 billion, with an annual inflation rate of -0.23%.
Meanwhile, Bitcoinâs supply increased by 1.716% over the same period. This highlights the different monetary policies of the two largest cryptocurrencies, as Bitcoin maintains predictable issuance rules. Therefore, Ethereum's supply changes now depend on the balance between staking rewards and transaction fee burning.
According to Ultrasound.moneyâs proof-of-work (PoW) simulation, if the Ethereum network had not switched to PoS, the supply of Ethereum would have increased by more than 5.5 million ETH during the same period. Under the PoW model, the simulation shows that at the same 1.5 million ETH burn rate, 7,031,556 ETH would be issued, resulting in a post-merger net increase of 5,521,564 ETH. According to the simulation, the value of these ETHs would be $21.865 billion, representing a theoretical inflation rate of 3.26%
This stark difference highlights the deflationary impact of Ethereumâs new consensus design compared to previous mining-based systems. The shift from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) significantly reduces the amount of new ETH issuance, as the network is now secured through validators staking ETH, rather than PoW miners. This shift, coupled with the continuous burning mechanism introduced by EIP-1559, has put downward pressure on Ethereumâs supply growth.
According to real-time data, the current total circulating supply of Ethereum is 120,103,624 ETH. At the same time, according to PoW simulations, the supply would reach 125,625,188 ETH if miners were still operating in the old model.
The reduction in supply since the merger is in line with the Ethereum communityâs vision of making ETH an asset that deflates over time, as opposed to Bitcoinâs fixed inflation rules. Advocates believe that the combination of staking rewards and fee burning will continue to offset new issuance, potentially causing ETH to enter a period of net negative growth.
An increase in Ethereum network fees has contributed to a rise in deflationary behavior over the past seven days, reaching -1.435%. Furthermore, even under PoW, its inflation rate will drop to 1.911% due to the surge in network activity and its correlation with the burning mechanism.
However, critics argue that the move to PoS centralizes control of the network into the hands of major staking entities and exchanges. Some have warned that the concentration of staked ETH could undermine Ethereumâs decentralization and security guarantees compared to Bitcoinâs more decentralized mining network.
As Ethereum continues to evolve under the new PoS regime, while Bitcoin maintains its established PoW model, observers will be watching closely to see how their respective supply dynamics and security tradeoffs unfold. Due to the upcoming Bitcoin halving, its issuance will be cut in half, bringing its inflation rate down to 0.8%, less than 1% different from Ethereum. However, the circulating supply of Bitcoin is fixed and will eventually reach zero inflation. Ethereumâs inflation rate is related to network activity and the amount burned through network transactions.
Still, ETHâs deflationary trend over the past 540 days, ahead of Bitcoinâs first halving since the merger, gives us a first look at the potential future of the two largest cryptocurrencies.
The long-term sustainability and impact of both networks remains to be seen, with Bitcoin currently having a market capitalization of $1.3 trillion and Ethereum not far behind with a market capitalization of $478 billion.
#TrendingTopic #EOS #Aevo #BTTC. #PEOPLEtoken
