In the 2024 U.S. election, the key seems to lie in Pennsylvania. If Trump secures Pennsylvania's 19 votes, it would be 287 to Harris's 251; if Harris secures Pennsylvania's 19 votes, it would be 270 to Trump's 268. Polls show that Trump's approval rating has significantly increased compared to 2020, indicating that Harris's strategy of replicating Biden's anti-Trump coalition in 2020 has failed. The current ruling party cannot respond to voter concerns with actual achievements and policy proposals, relying solely on debate rhetoric and similar strategies makes the election activities ineffective.

1. The importance of Pennsylvania has indeed reached an unprecedented height; it can almost be said that one state determines the outcome. Both Trump and Harris understand this, so we can see their campaign activities in Pennsylvania are very frequent and heavily invested. In this case, whoever can better communicate with local voters and solve their practical problems is more likely to win this crucial 19 votes.

2. Trump's approval rating is rising, indicating that voters still have expectations of him. It may be that some of his previous policy proposals have a certain influence on voters, such as those related to economic development, as people hope he can bring new changes to the American economy again.

3. Harris's strategy of replication failed, proving that voters are not easily fooled. She can't rely solely on previous tactics; there needs to be new and concrete things. Voters now value governance ability and the benefits they can bring.

4. The current ruling party has no actual achievements, which is a big problem. Voters are discerning; they cannot be swayed by mere rhetoric. They need to see real actions addressing employment, healthcare, education, and other issues of concern.

5. Debate rhetoric is just superficial work; what voters need now is substance. Policy proposals must be grounded and capable of solving real difficulties, such as how to improve infrastructure and reduce living costs—these are key.

6. In Pennsylvania, both sides need to pay attention to local industrial needs. If it's industry-led, then employment and industrial upgrading are the focus; if agriculture is more significant, then issues like agricultural product prices and subsidies need to be addressed properly.

7. Trump's advantage in Pennsylvania may come from his focus on traditional industries, such as his stance on the local coal industry, which may lead relevant workers to be more inclined to support him.

8. Harris needs to reassess her strategy; she can't just focus on opposing Trump. She needs to propose her own constructive plans, such as what good methods there are to balance environmental protection and economic development, allowing voters to see her uniqueness.

9. Changes in voter sentiment are very important; this election may reflect a rethinking of the direction of national development, whether to be more conservative or to reform more radically, which will be reflected in their voting choices.

10. The campaign team's work in Pennsylvania needs to be more detailed, deeply understanding the needs of each community. It's not enough to just hold large events; communication must be done with each household to clarify their ideas and policies to gain voter support.

11. Regardless of who wins this election, I hope the new government can truly pay attention to America's problems, avoid political struggles, and serve the people well, bringing America back on track.

The importance of Pennsylvania in the U.S. election indicates that the campaign needs to be pragmatic. Both sides need to consider the voters and not play games. I hope the new president can work for the development of America and the happiness of the people, and not let everyone down.#美联储利率决议来袭 #美国大选后涨或跌？ #btc