👉Recently, the crypto market has been marked by the unusual symbiosis of meme tokens and the gaming industry. Newer projects like Catizen (CATI) are riding a new wave of hype, attracting the attention of small investors and big players alike. But the question that arises is: do meme tokens and gaming tokens share a similar fate?
📝Meme tokens thrive on nostalgia and playful imagery, while gaming tokens like Axie Infinity and others focused on the Play-to-Earn (P2E) model offer a more complex narrative. But how sustainable is that economic component, really? Can a game built primarily on earning money rather than enjoyment truly survive?
📝The P2E model has undoubtedly shaken up the industry, but over time, we've seen games that rely solely on this model quickly fade into obscurity. Gaming must first and foremost be fun, engaging, and competitive. Players want a game that captivates them with its gameplay, and the earnings should come as a bonus. If a game lacks that core entertainment value, the P2E element becomes hollow and unsustainable. Games that exist purely for the potential of profit cannot maintain player engagement in the long term.
📝On the other hand, major games with a loyal and dedicated audience—games that offer players not just rewards, but valuable experiences and enjoyment—will survive. Players will always be willing to pay for quality content, while those projects driven only by the promise of quick earnings will soon be forgotten. Greed has never been a winning strategy in gaming—and it never will be.
🤔So the question remains: will meme tokens and gaming tokens evolve, or succumb to the fate of greed? Only time will tell.
